Should We Extend the Role of Private Social Expenditure? [E-Book] / Mark Pearson and John Martin
Some people make great claims about the advantages to be gained from greater reliance on the private sector for the provision of social protection. Many of the claims for great macroeconomic advantages do not stand up to scrutiny. However, there is some reason to hope that private provision might pr...
Saved in:
Full text |
|
Personal Name(s): | Pearson, Mark. |
Martin, John. | |
Imprint: |
Paris :
OECD Publishing,
2005
|
Physical Description: |
39 p. ; 21 x 29.7cm. |
Note: |
englisch |
DOI: |
10.1787/866271756736 |
Series Title: |
/* Depending on the record driver, $field may either be an array with
"name" and "number" keys or a flat string containing only the series
name. We should account for both cases to maximize compatibility. */?>
OECD Social, Employment and Migration Working Papers ;
23 |
Keywords: |
Social Issues/Migration/Health |
Some people make great claims about the advantages to be gained from greater reliance on the private sector for the provision of social protection. Many of the claims for great macroeconomic advantages do not stand up to scrutiny. However, there is some reason to hope that private provision might promote microeconomic efficiency and services which are more responsive to consumer preferences than those provided by a single monopoly public sector provider. Drawing on examples from recent OECD country experiences with private health insurance, care for children and the elderly, and private pension provision, three main conclusions can be drawn. First, opening provision to a diversity of providers has often promoted more choice and innovation. Second, however, efficiency gains have often been limited. This is due to a number of inter-related reasons: (a) Individualisation of packages of services is expensive. (b) In order to ensure adequate coverage of the ... |