This title appears in the Scientific Report :
2019
Please use the identifier:
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s42048-019-00036-5 in citations.
Human Enhancement: Deontological Arguments
Human Enhancement: Deontological Arguments
This is the second paper in a three-part series on the state of the enhancement debate. We report current trends and give an overview of established positions in the field of neuroenhancement. Unlike a number of articles on the bioethics of enhancement, we try to highlight connections between the co...
Saved in:
Personal Name(s): | Rüther, Markus (Corresponding author) |
---|---|
Heinrichs, Jan-Hendrik | |
Contributing Institute: |
Ethik in den Neurowissenschaften; INM-8 |
Published in: | Zeitschrift für Ethik und Moralphilosophie, 2 (2019) 1, S. 161-178 |
Imprint: |
Heidelberg
Springer
2019
|
DOI: |
10.1007/s42048-019-00036-5 |
Document Type: |
Journal Article |
Research Program: |
(Dys-)function and Plasticity |
Publikationsportal JuSER |
This is the second paper in a three-part series on the state of the enhancement debate. We report current trends and give an overview of established positions in the field of neuroenhancement. Unlike a number of articles on the bioethics of enhancement, we try to highlight connections between the contemporary debate and established positions in philosophical ethics. This specific perspective inspired the breakdown of our three-part series into consequentialist, deontological and virtue-ethical arguments. |