Skip to content
VuFind
  • 0 Items in e-Shelf (Full)
  • History
  • User Account
  • Logout
  • User Account
  • Help
    • English
    • Deutsch
  • Books & more
  • Articles & more
  • JuSER
Advanced
 
  • Literature Request
  • Cite this
  • Email this
  • Export
    • Export to RefWorks
    • Export to EndNoteWeb
    • Export to EndNote
    • Export to MARC
    • Export to MARCXML
    • Export to BibTeX
  • Favorites
  • Add to e-Shelf Remove from e-Shelf



QR Code
This title appears in the Scientific Report : 2021 

Setting thresholds to define indifferences and preferences in PROMETHEE for life cycle sustainability assessment of European hydrogen production

Setting thresholds to define indifferences and preferences in PROMETHEE for life cycle sustainability assessment of European hydrogen production

The Life Cycle Sustainability Assessment (LCSA) is a proven method for sustainability assessment. However, the interpretation phase of an LCSA is challenging because many different single results are obtained. Additionally, performing a Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA) is one way—not only for...

More

Saved in:
Personal Name(s): Wulf, Christina (Corresponding author)
Zapp, Petra / Schreiber, Andrea / Kuckshinrichs, Wilhelm
Contributing Institute: Systemforschung und Technologische Entwicklung; IEK-STE
Published in: Sustainability, 13 (2021) S. 7009
Imprint: Basel MDPI 2021
DOI: 10.3390/su13137009
Document Type: Journal Article
Research Program: Societally Feasible Transformation Pathways
Link: Get full text
Restricted
OpenAccess
Publikationsportal JuSER
Please use the identifier: http://hdl.handle.net/2128/28002 in citations.
Please use the identifier: http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/su13137009 in citations.

  • Description
  • Staff View

The Life Cycle Sustainability Assessment (LCSA) is a proven method for sustainability assessment. However, the interpretation phase of an LCSA is challenging because many different single results are obtained. Additionally, performing a Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA) is one way—not only for LCSA—to gain clarity about how to interpret the results. One common form of MCDAs are outranking methods. For these type of methods it becomes of utmost importance to clarify when results become preferable. Thus, thresholds are commonly used to prevent decisions based on results that are actually indifferent between the analyzed options. In this paper, a new approach is presented to identify and quantify such thresholds for Preference Ranking Organization METHod for Enrichment Evaluation (PROMETHEE) based on uncertainty of Life Cycle Impact Assessment (LCIA) methods. Common thresholds and this new approach are discussed using a case study on finding a preferred location for sustainable industrial hydrogen production, comparing three locations in European countries. The single LCSA results indicated different preferences for the environmental, economic and social assessment. The application of PROMETHEE helped to find a clear solution. The comparison of the newly-specified thresholds based on LCIA uncertainty with default thresholds provided important insights of how to interpret the LCSA results regarding industrial hydrogen production.

  • Forschungszentrum Jülich
  • Central Library (ZB)
  • Powered by VuFind 6.1.1
Loading...