Skip to content
VuFind
  • 0 Items in e-Shelf (Full)
  • History
  • User Account
  • Logout
  • User Account
  • Help
    • English
    • Deutsch
  • Books & more
  • Articles & more
  • JuSER
Advanced
 
  • Literature Request
  • Cite this
  • Email this
  • Export
    • Export to RefWorks
    • Export to EndNoteWeb
    • Export to EndNote
    • Export to MARC
    • Export to MARCXML
    • Export to BibTeX
  • Favorites
  • Add to e-Shelf Remove from e-Shelf


QR Code
This title appears in the Scientific Report : 2022 

Brain-age prediction: a systematic comparison of machine learning workflows

Brain-age prediction: a systematic comparison of machine learning workflows

Prediction of age using anatomical brain MRI, i.e., brain age, is proving valuable in exploring accelerated aging (brain age delta) as a proxy for aging-related diseases and crucial future health outcomes [1]. While various data representations and machine learning (ML) algorithms have been used for...

More

Saved in:
Personal Name(s): More, Shammi (Corresponding author)
Antonoupolous, Georgios / Hoffstaedter, Felix / Caspers, Julian / Eickhoff, Simon / Patil, Kaustubh
Contributing Institute: Gehirn & Verhalten; INM-7
Imprint: 2022
Conference: Organisation for Human Brain Mapping, Glasgow, Scotland (UK), 2022-06-19 - 2022-06-23
Document Type: Conference Presentation
Research Program: Neuroscientific Data Analytics and AI
Multilevel Brain Organization and Variability
Publikationsportal JuSER

  • Description
  • Staff View

Prediction of age using anatomical brain MRI, i.e., brain age, is proving valuable in exploring accelerated aging (brain age delta) as a proxy for aging-related diseases and crucial future health outcomes [1]. While various data representations and machine learning (ML) algorithms have been used for brain-age prediction [2,3], the impact of these choices on prediction accuracy remains uncharacterized. Moreover, several methodological challenges remain before a predictive model can be deployed in the real world; (1) robust within-site performance, (2) accurate cross-site prediction and, (3) consistent prediction for the same individual. To fill this gap, we systematically evaluated 70 workflows consisting of ten feature spaces derived from grey matter (GM) images and seven ML algorithms with diverse inductive biases to establish guidelines for designing brain-age prediction workflows.

  • Forschungszentrum Jülich
  • Central Library (ZB)
  • Powered by VuFind 6.1.1
Loading...