This title appears in the Scientific Report :
2014
Please use the identifier:
http://hdl.handle.net/2128/18175 in citations.
Please use the identifier: http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.4804411 in citations.
First operation with the JET International Thermonuclear Experimental Reactor-like wall
First operation with the JET International Thermonuclear Experimental Reactor-like wall
To consolidate International Thermonuclear Experimental Reactor (ITER) design choices and prepare for its operation, Joint European Torus (JET) has implemented ITER's plasma facing materials, namely, Be for the main wall and W in the divertor. In addition, protection systems, diagnostics, and t...
Saved in:
Personal Name(s): | Neu, R. (Corresponding Author) |
---|---|
Arnoux, G. / Beurskens, M. / Bobkov, V. / Brezinsek, S. / Bucalossi, J. / Calabro, G. / Challis, C. / Coenen, J. W. / de la Luna, E. / de Vries, P. C. / Dux, R. / Frassinetti, L. / Giroud, C. / Groth, M. / Hobirk, J. / Joffrin, E. / Lang, P. / Lehnen, M. / Lerche, E. / Loarer, T. / Lomas, P. / Maddison, G. / Maggi, C. / Matthews, G. / Marsen, S. / Mayoral, M.-L. / Meigs, A. / Mertens, Ph. / Nunes, I. / Philipps, V. / Pütterich, T. / Rimini, F. / Sertoli, M. / Sieglin, B. / Sips, A. C. C. / van Eester, D. / van Rooij, G. / JET-EFDA Contributors | |
Contributing Institute: |
Plasmaphysik; IEK-4 |
Published in: | Physics of plasmas, 20 (2013) 5, S. 056111 - |
Imprint: |
[S.l.]
American Institute of Physics
2013
|
DOI: |
10.1063/1.4804411 |
Document Type: |
Journal Article |
Research Program: |
Plasma-wall interactions |
Link: |
OpenAccess |
Publikationsportal JuSER |
Please use the identifier: http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.4804411 in citations.
To consolidate International Thermonuclear Experimental Reactor (ITER) design choices and prepare for its operation, Joint European Torus (JET) has implemented ITER's plasma facing materials, namely, Be for the main wall and W in the divertor. In addition, protection systems, diagnostics, and the vertical stability control were upgraded and the heating capability of the neutral beams was increased to over 30 MW. First results confirm the expected benefits and the limitations of all metal plasma facing components (PFCs) but also yield understanding of operational issues directly relating to ITER. H-retention is lower by at least a factor of 10 in all operational scenarios compared to that with C PFCs. The lower C content (≈ factor 10) has led to much lower radiation during the plasma burn-through phase eliminating breakdown failures. Similarly, the intrinsic radiation observed during disruptions is very low, leading to high power loads and to a slow current quench. Massive gas injection using a D2/Ar mixture restores levels of radiation and vessel forces similar to those of mitigated disruptions with the C wall. Dedicated L-H transition experiments indicate a 30% power threshold reduction, a distinct minimum density, and a pronounced shape dependence. The L-mode density limit was found to be up to 30% higher than for C allowing stable detached divertor operation over a larger density range. Stable H-modes as well as the hybrid scenario could be re-established only when using gas puff levels of a few 1021 es−1. On average, the confinement is lower with the new PFCs, but nevertheless, H factors up to 1 (H-Mode) and 1.3 (at βN≈3 , hybrids) have been achieved with W concentrations well below the maximum acceptable level. |